Skip to main content

National Merit Semifinalist Cutoffs Class of 2026

April 7, 2025: Commended cutoff at 210.
The Commended Student cutoff for the class of 2026 is confirmed at a Selection Index of 210. This was the exact level Compass projected in November based on PSAT results. This means that changes to our estimated ranges for Semifinalist cutoffs are minimal. The extreme edges — upper and lower — of our estimated ranges are a bit less probable, but the “Most Likely” scores are unchanged. The fact that Compass’s Commended cutoff estimate was correct, however, does not mean that the Semifinalist projections will prove just as accurate — there is always variability at the state level. Juniors scoring at or above 210 on the PSAT/NMSQT will be Commended Students or Semifinalists, but announcements are not made until September. Semifinalist cutoffs will not be revealed until late August or early September.

November 13: Updated with final wave of PSAT scores.
College Board released scores in three waves depending on when students took the PSAT. We have now received scores summaries for all three waves. It is possible that some late scores will still dribble in, but we are not expecting any changes. The results point to a strong upward trend in cutoffs for the class of 2026. You are welcome to jump to the table of estimates below, but we encourage students and families to read more about how we came to those estimates. For more information on the National Merit Program, in general, you may want to read Compass’s National Merit Scholarship Program Explained. If you want to browse almost two decades’ worth of cutoffs, you can find them in Compass’s National Merit Historical Cutoffs.

What is a Semifinalist Cutoff?
Each year almost 17,000 juniors are named Semifinalists in the National Merit Scholarship Program and continue on in the hopes of being one of the 15,000 Finalists and, eventually, one of the 7,500 scholarship recipients. The score needed to qualify as a Semifinalist varies by state and is known as the “cutoff.” Every student scoring at or above the Semifinalist cutoff qualifies. The cutoff is not based on a student’s overall PSAT score but on the Selection Index. The Selection Index is listed on a student’s PSAT score report. It can be calculated by doubling the ERW score, adding the Math score, and then dividing the sum by 10. For example, a 720 ERW / 730 M would have a Selection Index of (720 x 2 + 730)/10 = 217. For the class of 2025, cutoffs ranged from 208 to 223.

What is a Commended Student Cutoff?
If you performed well on the PSAT but do not qualify as a Semifinalist, you have the opportunity to be named as a Commended Student. Unlike the Semifinalist cutoffs, the Commended cutoff is set nationally. For last year’s class it was 208. Approximately 36,000 students are named Commended Students each year.

Why does Compass believe that we are likely to see cutoffs, as a whole, go up?
College Board releases very little data about score distribution. The number of top scorers is the most critical piece of information that we get this early in the process. While we do not know the number of students scoring at a particular Selection Index, we do know the number of students scoring in the 1400-1520 range, which roughly correlates to Selection Indexes of 210-228. The class of 2026 ranks 4th in the ten years since the PSAT scoring was overhauled, and this year sees the highest ever percentage of top scores. The number of Semifinalists and Commended students are capped, so cutoffs are likely to rise. But not all cutoffs. The numbers we have seen are at the national level and there is always churn at the state level. What we believe, however, is that more cutoffs will go up than down.

There is a good correlation between the 1400-1520 band of students and the Commended Student score. We believe that the Commended cutoff will come in between 209 and 211, with a 210 being most likely. Based on our historical archive of Semifinalist and Commended cutoffs, we believe that the average Semifinalist cutoff will go up this year.

Will I find out my status right away?
No. In fact, students don’t learn of Semifinalist status until September of senior year. Compass tracks data on current year performance and historical records to provides estimates and updates between PSAT score release and the Semifinalist announcements. Last year — the first year of the digital PSAT — saw a noticeable uptick in scores. Only one state — South Dakota — saw a lower cutoff versus the previous year’s. Was this a onetime quirk? Based on early results for the class of 2026, we do not believe that it was. The upward trend — whether due to the new test format, recovery from COVID-era learning loss, or other factors — appears to be continuing.

One mistake students make is thinking that the cutoff for one year will be the same in the next year. Cutoffs change every year, sometimes by as much as 5 or 6 points (granted, that’s unusual). Compass emphasizes an Estimated Range, which is likely to include the ultimate cutoff. Within that range, we do provide our Most Likely. That score represents our best estimate based on the known factors, but there are many unknown factors. Most of our PSAT performance data are for national results. So we can usually peg the Commended cutoff within a point or two. States, however, can move in different directions. More Alaskan students may test this year. Some strong Rhode Island prep schools may have decided to stop offering the PSAT. A COVID outbreak in Montana could mean more students using Alternate Entry and entering the competition using SAT scores. Below is a table that shows how many states in each of the last 17 years saw increases, decreases, or no change. There has never been a year where even half of all state cutoffs remain unchanged.

The chart below divides the 50 states into those that saw increases (blue), those that remained unchanged (gray), and those that saw declines (red).

Historically, a change in cutoff is more likely than not. Over the decade from 2015 – 2024, Semifinalist cutoffs remained unchanged only about one-third of the time.

Distribution of year-over-year cutoff changes shows that there is a roughly normal distribution, with no change occurring 30% of the time.

We believe that a table of results from this class will skew to the right.

Small states have more volatile cutoffs than large states, but there can be surprises across the board. The PSAT had a significant overhaul in scoring in 2017. If we look at the minimum and maximum cutoffs during the 9-year period from then until the class of 2025, we see that the 13 largest states (about 100,000 or more high school graduates) average a 2.8-point differential. New Jersey has a 1-point differential, since its lowest cutoff is 222 and highest is 223. The smallest states (fewer than 30,000 graduates) have a 6.2 point differential. Alaska has been as low as 208 and as high as 217! The medium-sized states average a 5-point difference between minimum and maximum.

Here are Compass’s current estimates for Semifinalist cutoffs for the class of 2026:


State
Class of 2026
Estimated Range
Class of 2026
Most Likely
Class of 2025
(Actual)
Class of 2024
(Actual)
Class of 2023
(Actual)
# of 2025 Semifinalists
Alabama210 - 216214212210212267
Alaska210 - 21621421420921036
Arizona215 - 220218217216214401
Arkansas210 - 215213213210210134
California220 - 2232222212212202103
Colorado216 - 221218218216217272
Connecticut220 - 222221221221221177
Delaware218 - 22122021921921843
District of Columbia222 - 22422322322322347
Florida216 - 220218217216216972
Georgia217 - 221219218217218624
Hawaii215 - 22021821721721574
Idaho212 - 217214213211215102
Illinois218 - 222220220219219738
Indiana214 - 219217217216214304
Iowa211 - 217214212210212156
Kansas213 - 219216215214214142
Kentucky211 - 217214213211212202
Louisiana212 - 217215214214213238
Maine212 - 21721521421321553
Maryland221 - 224222222221222296
Massachusetts221 - 224223223222220294
Michigan216 - 220218218217218511
Minnesota216 - 220218217216216288
Mississippi210 - 215213212209210155
Missouri214 - 218216215214213276
Montana208 - 21321020920920745
Nebraska210 - 216213211210212118
Nevada211 - 218215214211210162
New Hampshire214 - 21921721721521355
New Jersey222 - 224223223223223474
New Mexico209 - 21521221120720894
New York219 - 2212202202202191089
North Carolina216 - 220218218217217518
North Dakota209 - 21321021020720928
Ohio215 - 219217217216216582
Oklahoma209 - 215212211208211214
Oregon215 - 220217216216216205
Pennsylvania217 - 221219219219218583
Rhode Island213 - 22021721721521650
South Carolina210 - 217215214209213234
South Dakota209 - 21421120820921241
Tennessee215 - 219218217217215319
Texas218 - 2212202192192191714
Utah210 - 216213211209211195
Vermont211 - 21721521521221333
Virginia220 - 223222222219221394
Washington220 - 223221222220220358
West Virginia209 - 21221020920720766
Wisconsin213 - 217215214213213289
Wyoming209 - 21321120920720724
​U.S. Territories209 - 21121020820720745
​​Studying Abroad222 - 224223223223223112
​​​Commended209 - 211210208207207

If you’d like to see even more historical data, you can find cutoffs going back to 2008 in Compass’s National Merit Historical Cutoffs.

Why does each state have its own Semifinalist cutoff if the program is NATIONAL Merit?
This is always a hot button question. NMSC allocates the approximately 17,000 Semifinalists among states based on the annual number of high school graduates. That way, students across the nation are represented. It also means that there are very different qualifying standards from state to state. A Massachusetts student with a 220 might miss out on being a Semifinalist. If she lived 10 miles away in New Hampshire, she would qualify.

NMSC sets a target number of Semifinalists for a state. For example, California sees about 2,000 Semifinalists every year, Michigan 500, and Wyoming 25. In each state, NMSC determines the Selection Index that comes closest to matching its target number of Semifinalists. If 1,900 California students score 222 and higher and 2,050 score 221 or higher, then the Semifinalist cutoff would be 221 (this assumes that the target is exactly 2,000). Because score levels can get crowded, it is easy for cutoffs to move up or down a point even when there is minimal change in testing behavior or performance.

No Semifinalist cutoff can be lower than the national Commended level. Cutoffs for the District of Columbia and for U.S. students studying abroad are set at the highest state cutoff (typically New Jersey). The cutoff for students in U.S. territories and possessions falls at the Commended level each year. Boarding schools are grouped by region. The cutoff for a given region is the highest state cutoff within the region.

Why does the number of top scorers vary from year to year?
While there are changes in the number of students taking the PSAT/NMSQT, there can also be small flaws in test scaling that play a role. Prior to the digital PSAT, a single test form was seen by a large percentage of test takers. Something amiss with that single form could impact selection cutoffs across the country. The digital PSAT is constructed differently. Students receive unique form codes drawn from a large pool of problems. Scaled scores are generated based on the characteristics of those problems. In theory, this should make scores more stable. College Board’s early studies have found an extremely high correlation between the paper-and-pencil test and digital test. Still, even with its adaptive nature, the uncertainty remains as to whether the much shorter test can reliably score students at the 700-760 end of the scale.

What if I missed the PSAT because of illness or other legitimate reason?
You may still be able to enter the scholarship program by applying for Alternate Entry using an SAT score. Find information about last year’s process in Compass’s explanation of National Merit alternate entry.

When are National Merit Semifinalists announced?
The Commended cutoff becomes unofficially known by the end of April. The lists of Semifinalists are not distributed to high schools until the end of August. NMSC sets a press embargo on Semifinalist announcement until mid-September, but schools are allowed to notify students before that date. NMSC does not send Commended Student letters to high schools until mid-September. Compass will keep students updated on developments as those dates approach.

Do state and national percentiles indicate whether I will be a National Merit Semifinalist?
No! Approximately 1% of test takers qualify as Semifinalists each year, so it is tempting to view a 99th percentile score as indicating a high enough score — especially now that College Board provides students with percentiles by state. There are any number of flaws that rule out using percentiles as a quick way of determining National Merit status.

  • Percentiles are based on section scores or total score, not Selection Index
  • Percentiles are rounded. There is a large difference, from a National Merit perspective, between the top 0.51% and the top 1.49%
  • Percentiles reveal the percentage of students at or below a certain score, but the “at” part is important when NMSC is determining cutoffs.
  • The number of Semifinalists is based on the number of high school graduates in a state, not the number of PSAT takers. Percentiles are based on PSAT takers. States have widely varying participation rates.
  • Most definitive of all: Percentiles do not reflect the current year’s scores! They are based on the prior 3 years’ performance. They are set even before the test is given. And if you are going to use prior history, why not use the completely accurate record of prior National Merit cutoffs rather than the highly suspect percentiles?

Entry requirements for National Merit versus qualifying for National Merit.
Your PSAT/NMSQT score report tells you whether you meet the eligibility requirements for the NMSP. In general, juniors taking the October PSAT are eligible. If you have an asterisk next to your Selection Index, it means that your answers to the entrance questions have made you ineligible. Your answers are conveniently noted on your score report. If you think there is an error, you will also find instructions on how to contact NMSC. Meeting the eligibility requirements simply means that your score will be considered. Approximately 1.4 million students enter the competition each year. Only about 53,000 students will be named as Commended Students, Semifinalists, Finalists, or Scholars. See National Merit Explained for more information.

Share this post with friends:

Art Sawyer

Art graduated magna cum laude from Harvard University, where he was the top-ranked liberal arts student in his class. Art pioneered the one-on-one approach to test prep in California in 1989 and co-founded Compass Education Group in 2004 in order to bring the best ideas and tutors into students' homes and computers. Although he has attained perfect scores on all flavors of the SAT and ACT, he is routinely beaten in backgammon.

4,404 Comments

  • Cristen says:

    Mr. Sawyer, how are the commended students chosen? Does the NMSC choose them, and then notify the school?

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Cristen,
      NMSC determines the Selection Index that identifies approximately the top 55,000 students. Those not qualifying as Semifinalists (about 16,000) are named Commended Students (about 39,000). The Selection Index cutoff this year was 212, and that is applied nationally. NMSC notifies schools.

      • PG says:

        Thank you for the explanation. My son earned a 217 in Maryland so is not a semi-finalist. It sounds like he is getting the designation of a Commended Student and would love for him to put that on his college application. So far he hasn’t heard anything and he is likely going to start submitting applications this week. Has it been published to the schools yet?

        • Art Sawyer says:

          PG,
          High schools have been mailed Commended lists, but they sometimes disappear into a black hole. I would check with your son’s counselor. You might also try calling NMSC. At 217, he can be confident that he was named a Commended Student.

  • Kate says:

    Hi, how do I get the list of names for New Jersey? Thank you.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Kate,
      State lists are only available when media outlets choose to post them. Most only list area students. You could try contacting the reporter to see if they can email you the entire list. I know that some students and parents have been successful in the past.

  • Kerri says:

    Mr. Sawyer, Can you elaborate a bit on the comment you share about leaving the first college choice as “undecided” so that you do not miss on other possible scholarships from other schools? Thanks!

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Kerri,
      The best advice is to keep the First Choice up-to-date at all times. Using Undecided is one way of preventing an unwanted match, but the better way is usually to regularly evaluate the student’s choice. It won’t matter at all until the end of Feb, as names will start being released to colleges in March. Even after that, choices can be changed. The folks at NMSC are good at helping students navigate this process. If a student forgets to change from Undecided, NMSC will usually check in to see if a choice has actually been made. If a student has a clear first choice now, no reason not to put it down. If the student is still weighing several schools, you might want to leave it as Undecided. In either case, set a reminder — set several reminders — in February to revisit the choice.

      None of this matters for students planning on attending a college that does not provide NM scholarships.

  • Anna says:

    Hi Art––

    I know this comes much later than some of the other states, but I just received the full list of New York State semifinalists. Since it doesn’t look like it’s been posted here yet, I thought I would provide a link. https://www.dropbox.com/s/e4rhd368kcodfa0/NY%20National%20Merit%20Semifinalists%202020.pdf?dl=0

    Thank you for all your hard work!

    -Anna

  • Shawn says:

    Art – thank you for all your assistance. My daughter is completing her NMSF application and I want to ensure we understand the question – List one time honors or awards received. I am a bit confused – if she is always on the honor roll every semester, should we list this once?

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Shawn,
      Her academic record will speak for itself, so I don’t think listing honor roll adds anything to her application. This is a place for more specialized honors or awards.

  • Mp says:

    Morning – How are students notified if they make the ‘commended’ level? Thanks!

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Mp,
      Schools are sent notifications (they were mailed out about 4 weeks ago). I would check with your college counselor or principal.

      • BandMom says:

        Checked with our school and they haven’t received info regarding commended. My son had a score of 218. Is there another way to find out? Would like to put it on college applications.

        • Art Sawyer says:

          BandMom,
          I would contact NMSC. (847) 866-5100. As long as he was otherwise eligible, we know that his 218 qualified. I would feel comfortable listing his Commended status.

  • Greg says:

    Hi M. Sawyer. Last year as a Sophomore my son scored a 1260 on the PSAT. Does this score indicate a good possibility of him earning NM semifinalist status?

    His strength is math as he took Calculus 1 and 2 at the local university last year (his high does not offer AP Calculus B/C) and earned A’s. On the PSAT math section he missed three question (unfortunately simple computational errors) and his score was a 640. Given that a perfect math score is 760 how is it that he lost 120 points with just three wrong answers? Is this accurate? He has been working hard to try to try and be a NM semifinalist (or higher) this year but is discouraged by the grading/scoring system. He feels he has to be perfect.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Greg,
      Your son took the Oct 24, 2018 PSAT which had an extremely unusual scale. The math problems were far easier than usual, so the scale was far harsher to balance things out. On the Oct 10 form, for example, 3 wrong was a 730. Putting that aside, making NMSF is challenging. The ERW score is critical, since it is doubled in calculating a Selection Index. A student scoring 750 ERW could get a 700 and still reach a 220, for example. A student scoring 720 ERW would need a perfect 760 M to reach the same level. Those scores represent significant improvement from your son’s sophomore. NMSF is not out of the question, but it will require him hitting all of his marks.

  • Kevin says:

    Hi Art,
    My 11th grader recently prepped for the Sept ACT and did quite well (99 percentile) but she just ran out of time to look at any SAT/PSAT materials before yesterday’s test.

    Any chance her ACT prep correlates enough with the PSAT to have given her an edge, or did we drop the ball? PSAT 10 score last year was a 1360 before any studying so she had a lot of ground to cover.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Kevin,
      Many of the testing skills are transferrable. I’d remain optimistic, especially since the alternative won’t help her PSAT score at this point. Fingers crossed for good news in December.

    • JOSEPH says:

      I would like the full list of 2020 National Merit Semifinalists for Ohio; I have contacted several media outlets without success. 😞

  • Grace says:

    Hi Mr. Sawyer, my son and a few other fellow students in his school made NM semifinalist. Today from the school newsletter, I saw one of them made to the finalist. We have not heard any status about my son. Do you know if the selection has been completed? Thanks.

  • Deb says:

    Hi Mr. Swayer, does NMSC consider ACT scores for selecting Semi-Finalists. My 11th grader is giving ACT instead of SAT

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Deb,
      Semifinalists are chosen entirely based on junior year PSAT score, which was administered last month. For students qualifying as Semifinalists, NMSC does consider ACT scores when evaluating students for Finalist status.

  • D Haus says:

    So, I know it’s a little “off topic”, but how can one get some historic information? Looking for data from 1989-90. State cut offs and Commended info. Also seeking info for the Achievement (African American) and Latino National Merit competitions from that year, if possible….

    • Art Sawyer says:

      D,
      I do not know of any source for that information. NMSC does not publicly release cutoffs, and I don’t know of anyone who was able to collect them going back that far. The NHRP is run by College Board, which has also not released historical data.

  • Irene says:

    Oct 16th PSAT curve was brutal. Any more than one wrong in each section put you below a 220 Selection Index. I’d love your best guess on Commended Cutoff for next year based on historic movement. Thanks.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Irene,
      It’s frustrating the College Board has done this again. Do you have a source on the curve this year? I haven’t yet seen the public release. It’s very difficult to extrapolate from a curve to the impact on SI. I’ll be taking a look at as much release data as possible over the coming days and weeks to update estimates. Thanks.

      • Nervous says:

        Hi Art,
        I saw someone on another site say that bc the curve was harsh, that suggests that kids scored higher nationally and the Commended Score may likely go to 214. I’m hoping that’s wrong since what the highest scoring kids did isn’t necessarily representative of what *most* kids did, correct?

        On another site people contended that with a harsh curve, Selection Indexes would in fact go *down.* What has been your experience?

        Is there reason to hope that 214 is too high for Commended since it’s also used as the NMF confirming score? Thanks as always for your valued insight!

        • Art Sawyer says:

          Nervous,
          To quote the Hollywood screenwriter William Goldman, “Nobody knows anything.”

          We can’t discern what will happen based only on the scales. We certainly can’t assume that it points to higher scores, overall. I think that commenter is making some faulty assumptions. It is entirely possible, of course, that the Commended cutoff does move up, but the scale doesn’t tell us that. I hope to find out more about how many students scored in the 700-800 ranges in ERW and Math. That would be a better predictor of the Commended level (less useful for higher cutoffs).

          • Still Nervous says:

            Art,
            Thanks for important insight. I’m *very* curious to know whether you think Commended 214 is unlikely if the Commended/confirming score this year was 212.

            I would love to think 214 is too high to be expected of the NMSF to achieve for confirming scores in the lower cutoff states but maybe that’s wishful thinking from a parent with a kid sitting at 213. :-/

          • Art Sawyer says:

            Nervous,
            I don’t think it’s wishful thinking to expect the cutoff to come in below 214, but I don’t think we are going to know enough to completely rule it out before we get word in April. Two point movements upward are uncommon, but not unprecedented.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      I see they are now posted. I know how my day is being spent…

      • Theresa says:

        Related to Irene’s question, how does a curve like this typically affect the state cutoff scores — or does it? Thank you for sharing your wisdom every year!

        • Art Sawyer says:

          Theresa,
          There isn’t usually a discernible connection. In a perfect world, the scale has no impact. Easier questions = harsher scale. Harder questions = easier scale. Everything should be in balance. The reality is not so clean when we are talking about the edge cases of National Merit. There is little room for error. For example, 1 wrong Reading question (and perfect Writing) dropped a student from 760 ERW to 740. That’s a drop of 4 points on the Selection Index. So doesn’t that mean cutoffs are likely to go down? It’s not that simple, since the easier makeup of this year’s Reading also means that it was easier for students to obtain a perfect score. Bright side: Easier to reach a 760. Dark side: A bigger drop with a single error.

          • Ankit says:

            Do you have any idea of any estimate of how many perfect scores there are in any given year? Even just a ballpark idea. I’m not going to quote you on anything, I’m just curious.

          • Art Sawyer says:

            Ankit,
            There is no data released on this, but my back-of-the-envelope would be about 1,500 – 2,000 students or around 0.1% of testers.

      • Saitej says:

        Are you gonna post the new predicted cutoffs for the class of 2012? This new curve was harsh and will it be generally lower than previous years?

        • Art Sawyer says:

          Saitej,
          I’m trying to gather as much information as possible and will have something up by next week. The harsh curve does not necessarily mean that cutoffs will be lower. The easier tests would also mean that students performed better — in terms of raw points.

          • Neon F says:

            Hello, Art, I got a score of 211 and I’m freaking out that I missed the commended cutoff of 2012 from last year. However, as stated previously by many, the score curve for this year was one of the worst ever so I was wondering what my chances would be of being commended. My national percentile based on my composite score was 97 as it was 1420. People who got 1440s and 1450s where in the 98th percentile if that helps. Thank you.

          • Art Sawyer says:

            Neon,
            There is certainly a possibility of the Commended level moving down to 211. The only thing I know for sure, though, is that percentiles won’t tell us whether that is true or not. The percentiles are calculated from results on the 2016, 2017, and 2018 exams. They don’t tell us anything about the distribution of scores this year. Realistically, the Commended level is going to be in the 210-214 range. Our ability to pin it down more specifically is very much limited by the amount of data supplied by College Board. We won’t know anything for sure until April. Which won’t, of course, stop me and you and many others from speculating.

          • Neon F says:

            Hey Art, the official college board scores came out and my 1420 classified as the 99th percentile can you help me make a sense out of that info since a week ago it was the unofficaly 97th percentile.

          • Art Sawyer says:

            Neon,
            On the printed score report, College Board uses the Nationally Representative Sample percentile — in other words, an estimate of your percentile if every junior in the U.S. took the PSAT. The 97th percentile you saw is the User percentile and includes only students who took the PSAT from 2016 – 2018. That group is filled with more college-bound students, so the percentiles are lower. I find it the more accurate number, and feel that it is misleading for College Board to emphasize the fake number.

      • FL parent says:

        Now that you have had a couple of days to dissect the information, any initial thoughts on the Oct 16th vs the Oct 30th PSAT test? Which curve will be more brutal for the kids who took each one?

        • Art Sawyer says:

          FL,
          One of the things that I hated about last year’s Oct 24th form was that it reeked of unfairness. Yes, it was an easier form, but it was so outside the norm that the scale couldn’t possibly deal with the difference in an accurate manner. The difference between 4 wrong on the Oct 10 form (720) and 4 wrong on the Oct 24 form (620) was 100 points. The difference this year is 10 points.

          Whatever complaints students might have about this year’s set of exams, they are in it together. There is little difference between the two forms — probably less than usual. The Reading test was a bit easier on the 10/16 form (harsher scale), but the Writing was a bit easier on the 10/30 form. I looked at the various combinations of -1, -2, and -3 for ERW, and the scores are almost identical. The Math exams were quite similar if we are to believe the scales. There is basically a 10 point difference between -1, -2, -3, and -4. That’s a typical adjustment based on test difficulty.

          It’s hard to know what impact this year’s scales will have compared to last year, but I do think the two dates are comparable. It’s unfortunate that NMSF cutoffs in the most competitive states can mean that things boil down to luck on 1 or 2 problems (or at least the careless errors or brain freezes that we often call “bad luck”).

          I’ll be writing this up more extensively for the post. [And showing my work so that readers can point out any mistakes!]

  • LD says:

    My son scored a 1510 on the College Board’s PSAT Practice Exam 2 that he took the week before the 10/16 PSAT, and his lowest verbal score on the College Board’s SAT Practice Exams 1-4 was 720 (got 740, 720, 730 and 760 on the verbal sections). His guidance counselor told him his Oct 16 scores today: 760 math, but 690 verbal (don’t know how he was unable to break 700). His index score is 214. My son is so devastated by this score, as he was quite confident he would meet the National Merit cutoff. I don’t know how to explain this to him. To make matters worse, he plans to take the SAT (first time) this Saturday on 12/07. I think his confidence is completely shaken and he feels his upcoming SAT will not go well even though he earned the following scores on the College Board’s SAT Practice Exams 5, 8, 9 and 10: 1560 (790V, 770M), 1520 (750V, 770M), 1570 (770V, 800M), and 1550 (760V, 790M). He is hoping to score 1550 this Saturday. Are the practice exams put out by the College Board poor predictors of actual test day scores?

    Interestingly, on the College Board’s SAT Practice Exam 5, he made 2 verbal errors and 2 math errors with a score of 1560 (790V, 770M). On SAT Practice Exam 10, he made 3 verbal errors and 2 math errors (just one more verbal error), but his score dropped to 1520 (a 40-point decline for 1 more error). Did something like this happen with this PSAT?

    My son asked if an error might have been made and if it might be worthwhile to request his test get rescored – is that advisable?

    I’ve never posted anything online before, but it breaks my heart to see my son so crushed today, and I am desperately searching for some guidance (and some encouragement for him as he heads into his SAT this Saturday). Thank you!

    • Art Sawyer says:

      LD,
      The most important thing, at this point, is to maintain a positive outlook for the SAT. I think your son’s confidence will come back, and it sounds like the 690 was just an anomaly. Practice tests 1-4 are prototypes that were never used in the wild. Practice tests 5-10 are released exams, so they accurately reflect SAT content. The scaling differences also give a sense of how things can fluctuate.

      The test scales are designed to even out any difficulty differences across forms. A similar group of students might be able to average 46 out of 48 questions right on one exam and 44 out of 48 questions right on another. The raw to scaled score conversions would take this into account. This does mean that the easier the questions, the harsher the scale will be when a student does make an error. The ERW sections of this year’s PSAT were easy, so even a few errors led to significant drops. It looks like he missed 5 ERW questions and no math questions.

      I don’t believe there is any provision for rescoring. His results will be available online next week, so he can look to see if his answers make sense.

      • LD says:

        Thank you so much for your reply! Do you have a sense of what the cutoff for the commended students might be? My son does not seem to care too much about it now, as it still feels like a failure to him, but I think he will appreciate it when the time comes. Thanks!

        • Art Sawyer says:

          LD,
          A 3-point change is highly unusual. I don’t see any chance of the Commended level moving to 215. Your son is safe at 214.

    • Peter says:

      Hello Art,
      With so many of our kids losing their NMSF chances due this year’s curve, I am now speculating on Commended (with admittedly not much more than novice guessing).
      I looked at the info from the College Board and I see that 1410 was 97 percentile and 1390 was considered 96 percentile. Is there any point at all is looking at the 97 percentile in EBRW (which was a 710) and the 97 percentile in Math (which was a 730) and speculating that it gives a SI of 215 for the most likely Commended Score? If we apply the same to the 96 Percentile it gives us a 212.

      I’m thinking this misses the mark b/c percentile scores are almost always a little different when you consider the student’s overall score. The above formula would assume that the student is equally skilled in math and EBRW when in reality one could skew way higher than the other, significantly impacting the SI. So based on that logic I would rule out 215. I also hope for the sake of some of my friends that 212 will hold.

      Can you shed any perspective on where the Commended score may fall this year based on the percentiles the College Board disseminated?

      • Art Sawyer says:

        Peter,
        At least this speculation I can answer definitively. Percentiles are a dead end. There are multiple reasons for this, but the easiest to understand is that the percentiles aren’t actually based on this year’s exam. They are “based on the actual scores of students…in the past three school years.” What’s more, College Board means the school years prior to this one! So it is based on results from the PSATs in 2016, 2017, and 2018. So even if we tried to get around the other problems you point out (such as the assumption that students are even in performance), the percentiles simply don’t apply.

  • siri says:

    if u live in virginia and got a 1480 with a nmsqt of 220, is there a chance to make national semifinalist because i heard this year was very hard for all students and not many ppl crossed 1450

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Siri,
      We don’t have enough information to say for sure. We may be able to gather more information from large schools to see how widespread the situation you describes is. Students should remain positive. I think there is a good chance that we will see declines in cutoffs.

      • Daniel says:

        Art,
        Similarly, daughter got 1460/219 in Ohio which should be plenty. However, she goes to boarding school that is also in Ohio, yet they go by Illinois cutoff which has been 221. Any chance we can change that , or that Illinois cutoff may fall to 219 this year?

        Thank you!

        • Art Sawyer says:

          Daniel,
          The state with the highest cutoff sets the standard in a region — that will likely be IL again. My research is showing that scores have declined this year. I think it is entirely possible that a 219 will qualify.

  • FriendlyDreams says:

    Art,

    Regardless of the difficulty of the test, I would like to believe that the smartest students make the dumbest mistakes. With last year’s SI cutoff of 223 for MA, about 4-5 mistakes were tolerated. If the cutoff is set to 223 this year, it means that essentially, the only two ways to get there is 2 mistakes, one in writing and math, or 2 mistakes in math. This holds for both the primary and alternate dates. Doesn’t this seem particularly harsh?

    • Art Sawyer says:

      It does, but the models that estimate test difficulty should take this into account. I am sure that I could create a test where elite students would make virtually no mistakes. This year’s PSATs aren’t that extreme, but that’s the idea about what is going on. While I don’t think we should rule out 223 cutoffs, I would not be at all surprised to see them move to 222 (or even lower). I’d like to gather more data, though, before altering my rule of “last year’s figure is the best estimate.”

  • Bob says:

    Hello Mr. Sawyer,

    This may seem like an off topic question, but it is a hypothetical one I have nonetheless. With the PSAT being made astoundingly easier than ever before in the last 12 years, and with more crowding of the top spots for semifinalists, is it safe to say that this trend will continue? Will the test be only made easier that it is now, or will it be ever made harder?

    Regards,
    Bob

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Bob,
      One of the problems is that NMSC has no say in the test construction — it’s entirely up to College Board. College Board has little incentive to make a test that performs more accurately for students at the high end of the curve, because it would mean “borrowing” reliability from elsewhere along the curve. Every year about 4 million students take a PSAT. Only 60,000 will fall somewhere within the National Merit program. I don’t think College Board is trying to make the test easier so much as it is failing to produce consistent forms.

      • MomCat says:

        Hey, Art,

        I apologize for writing this as a reply to a different comment. I’m having technical glitches and can’t get around your website.

        Do you have any thoughts about the implications with regards to the National Merit Scholarship qualifying for students who go to boarding school? Students who go to boarding school out of their home state? Students who go to a New England boarding school outside of their homestate? Is there any way to analyze whether there is a proportional number of out of state NE boarding school students who achieve finalist status compared to how many achieve NM scholar? Do any? Our DD had an SI of 225 in 2018. Home state MD. BS in CT. Her scores were measured against MA. She made the finalist cut but did not get chosen as a scholar. I understand the NM scholarship is not a boatload of $ relatively speaking but she had all of the other credentials as an applicant/nominee except for going to public school in state. (She attends a college she threw an application in to last minute because she had time to submit another. Had never visited. It was not her lifelong dream school. Turns out to be a great match. You know it-your alma mater. Only sharing to illustrate she was a strong candidate).

        Anyhow, I’m curious if you have spent any time looking at this. There were other instances where being a boarding school student was a handicap such as with some Senate youth program. I don’t remember the specific one but you had to go to school in the state of your permanent residence or you could not qualify. S he has a Capitol Hill internship as a college freshman so again, she clearly powers her own engine, but it was another experience that seemed unfair to me).

        Thanks.

        MomCat

        • Art Sawyer says:

          MomCat,
          NMSC does not publicly release a breakdown of scholars by state or boarding school region. The competition is certainly fierce in some areas, because boarding school students compete with other boarding school students.

  • Rog says:

    Art, I got a 1450 on this year’s psat with a 690 math (-4) and a 760 reading writing. Will the harsh curve help keep the Texas cutoff at 221 (what I got) or will it be more likely to go up. Thank you

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Rog,
      I’ve had a chance to deep dive into score data, and it looks like we will see declines in most — if not all — cutoffs. I expect 221 to be NMSF in Texas.

  • Daniel says:

    Hello Mr. Sawyer,
    Recently I took the PSAT on the 16th, and when I got my scores back, I was surprised but glad to get an index score of 221. I live in Texas, and the cutoff score last year (and the two before it) happened to be a 221 as well. It seems like predicting the future cutoff score is impossible, but do you expect to get a potential idea on which way the cutoff score will go in the coming months? In other words, do you think it will become more apparent which way the tide will go, or do you think there’s not any possible predictor until the day it is released? Obviously it is important not to get overly delighted if indeed the tides seem to be steering towards a constant/lower cutoff year, and likewise not get overly gloomy if it seems like it will go higher, however my curiosity is still high. On a slightly different note, do you believe there are any distinct differences in what the college board looks at for its finalists and say colleges look at for its students? It seems like most factors are the same, grades, extracurriculars, strong essay, etc., however I’m interested in hearing if you believe any noticeable difference exists.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Daniel,
      It’s taken me quite some time, but the research I’ve done points to lower cutoffs — probably across the board. I don’t see the TX cutoff moving to 222.

  • Adam says:

    Hello Mr. Sawyer,

    I am an 11th grader in NJ and received a 222 SI score (1 wrong in math and reading). Although I will not know for sure whether NJ’s cutoff will go down, you keep saying that you are waiting for more information before you change your prediction. What information are you referring to, and what is the timetable for updates? Also, do you think given that NJ’s cutoff was 223 the past three years, it is less likely to go down than other states? CA and MD went down from 223 to 222 last year, but their previous cutoffs were not as high as NJ’s previous cutoffs.
    Thank you very much for this resource. My dad was pushing me to try to become a semifinalist, but I didn’t care so much until I saw how close my score is. It’d suck to do so well and just miss it, and I’m really anxious to know.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Adam,
      College Board releases summary data to counselors, and schools also receive data on their own students, of course. I’ve had a chance to research these sources over the last month, and they point (strongly) to lower scores. I think there is a very good chance that NJ’s cutoff will move to 222. I’ll be publishing more about this later in the week, I hope.

  • James says:

    Hello, Mr. Sawyer,

    I just had my stomach fall out. I have a homeschooled son who takes several courses at the local high school, where he also sat for his PSAT. He scored a 36 on his ACT this fall, and he got his PSAT/NMSQ scores back last week, getting a 1470, which translates as a 221 Selection Index Score. In our state, ID, that should qualify him for semi-finalist status. However, I just noticed an asterisk next to his score, which referenced this comment:

    The asterisk (*) next to your Selection Index score means you do not meet entry requirements for the 2021 National Merit Scholarship Program. See your responses in the “Entry Requirements” section on this page.

    Under “Entry Requirements” I see this:

    Information you provided on your answer sheet

    High school student
    YES

    Year to complete high school and enroll full-time in college
    after 2022

    Years to be spent in grades 9-12
    4

    My son is graduating high school in 2021. He is applying for college next year, in 2020. However, he had in his head that since he was considering seeking a deferred admission he would not be “enrolling full-time” in college until 2022. He has totally misunderstood this eligibility question and thought he was being honest.

    Can this be remedied? Again, I feel sick.

    James

  • Jeff says:

    Is 225 good enough for NM semifinal in CT? Thanks.

  • Jen says:

    As I’m starting college research, I was wondering if my 223 SSI would be enough to qualify me in TX (class of 2021)? I am nervous despite the past years of a 221 trend, and don’t want to get invested in schools who give a NMF scholarship only to just miss qualifying.

  • PN says:

    Hi Art,
    How is the selection from Semi finalist to finalist made? My daughter has a SI of 225 so hoping she will be a SF.

    Thanks.

    • Art Sawyer says:

      PN,
      Congratulations to your daughter! She will need a confirming score on the SAT or ACT. She will need excellent grades and the recommendation of her school. She will receive information about applying through the Finalist portal in September. She will need to write and essay. Here is information for last year’s class.

  • AD says:

    Hi Art,

    Will a 221 qualify for National Merit in Texas?

  • Jess says:

    Hi Art,

    My son scored a 218 SI in Arizona. Any chance for the NMSF cutoff to be reduced in AZ?

    Thank you for all your hard work responding to questions!

    • Art Sawyer says:

      Jess,
      We don’t know with certainty, but I think it likely that Arizona’s cutoff will drop by at least a point.

Leave a Reply


Get Your Free Compass Prep SAT Guide!